<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Law of the Harvest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.recycleyourfaith.com/2009/07/20/the-law-of-the-harvest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.recycleyourfaith.com/2009/07/20/the-law-of-the-harvest/</link>
	<description>travel to new places in your spiritual thought life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:42:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dswarts</title>
		<link>http://www.recycleyourfaith.com/2009/07/20/the-law-of-the-harvest/comment-page-1/#comment-32519</link>
		<dc:creator>dswarts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recycleyourfaith.com/?p=634#comment-32519</guid>
		<description>interesting angle. what scripture is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting angle. what scripture is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://www.recycleyourfaith.com/2009/07/20/the-law-of-the-harvest/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 04:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recycleyourfaith.com/?p=634#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Very thought provoking.  Going on the presumption that scripture initially spoke to the culture at hand, it seems necessary to find the essence of what the &quot;law&quot; was really about.  I think generosity is a good view.  I also wonder/presume if the non-specifics were intentional---that we are not to dwell on precise measurement.  It&#039;s easier to follow the spirit of the law rather than the letter of law when there is no means of quantifying your faithfulness.  Perhaps &quot;am I doing enough?&quot; should always be on our lips.
This is sort of a poor illustration, but here goes:
I have friends who I regularly share lunches/dinners with (at the office and socially).  The &quot;accounting&quot; of who brought what and how much, or the tally of the dinner tab is really loose.  If anything the waitress gets the benefit of everyone throwing in a little extra.  If anyone&#039;s short we all just throw in a little more.  We know it&#039;s not that important, that some days we&#039;re the one who is short and it probably evens out in the end.  This practice establishes a sense of community, sharing and generosity.
I also have friends who when we go out tabulate the splitting of the check to the penny.  It I ever need to borrow a buck to cover the tip, I know I better remember to pay them back because they will certainly remember.  The same persons shy away from sharing any of the office luncheons because the don&#039;t want to be obligated to anyone (or vice versa).  It&#039;s established a whole different kind of relationship, one with very clear boundaries.
Translate that concept to my relationship with God.  If I fixate on a precise accounting of my generosity to those in need, am I not establishing a kind of relationship where I am building those same kinds of boundaries with God.  Certainly I am opening myself up to deserving that God might treat me in the same way.  But if I harvest my metaphorical field with a generous spirit, how much more will I reap in the end.  How much more will I allow my heart to feel and by led by the hand of God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very thought provoking.  Going on the presumption that scripture initially spoke to the culture at hand, it seems necessary to find the essence of what the &#8220;law&#8221; was really about.  I think generosity is a good view.  I also wonder/presume if the non-specifics were intentional&#8212;that we are not to dwell on precise measurement.  It&#8217;s easier to follow the spirit of the law rather than the letter of law when there is no means of quantifying your faithfulness.  Perhaps &#8220;am I doing enough?&#8221; should always be on our lips.<br />
This is sort of a poor illustration, but here goes:<br />
I have friends who I regularly share lunches/dinners with (at the office and socially).  The &#8220;accounting&#8221; of who brought what and how much, or the tally of the dinner tab is really loose.  If anything the waitress gets the benefit of everyone throwing in a little extra.  If anyone&#8217;s short we all just throw in a little more.  We know it&#8217;s not that important, that some days we&#8217;re the one who is short and it probably evens out in the end.  This practice establishes a sense of community, sharing and generosity.<br />
I also have friends who when we go out tabulate the splitting of the check to the penny.  It I ever need to borrow a buck to cover the tip, I know I better remember to pay them back because they will certainly remember.  The same persons shy away from sharing any of the office luncheons because the don&#8217;t want to be obligated to anyone (or vice versa).  It&#8217;s established a whole different kind of relationship, one with very clear boundaries.<br />
Translate that concept to my relationship with God.  If I fixate on a precise accounting of my generosity to those in need, am I not establishing a kind of relationship where I am building those same kinds of boundaries with God.  Certainly I am opening myself up to deserving that God might treat me in the same way.  But if I harvest my metaphorical field with a generous spirit, how much more will I reap in the end.  How much more will I allow my heart to feel and by led by the hand of God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

